Electra Battery Materials (NASDAQ:ELBM – Get Free Report) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP – Get Free Report) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and profitability.
Valuation and Earnings
This table compares Electra Battery Materials and MP Materials”s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
| Electra Battery Materials | N/A | N/A | -$21.49 million | ($1.23) | -1.14 |
| MP Materials | $203.85 million | 56.45 | -$65.42 million | ($0.63) | -103.13 |
Analyst Recommendations
This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Electra Battery Materials and MP Materials, as provided by MarketBeat.com.
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
| Electra Battery Materials | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2.00 |
| MP Materials | 1 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 2.64 |
Electra Battery Materials presently has a consensus price target of $2.20, suggesting a potential upside of 57.14%. MP Materials has a consensus price target of $77.80, suggesting a potential upside of 19.74%. Given Electra Battery Materials’ higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Electra Battery Materials is more favorable than MP Materials.
Insider & Institutional Ownership
32.9% of Electra Battery Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.6% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 22.7% of Electra Battery Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of MP Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Volatility & Risk
Electra Battery Materials has a beta of 2.53, suggesting that its stock price is 153% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MP Materials has a beta of 2.32, suggesting that its stock price is 132% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Profitability
This table compares Electra Battery Materials and MP Materials’ net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
| Electra Battery Materials | N/A | -41.78% | -16.56% |
| MP Materials | -41.87% | -9.34% | -4.17% |
Summary
MP Materials beats Electra Battery Materials on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
About Electra Battery Materials
Electra Battery Materials Corporation engages in the acquisition and exploration of resource properties in the United States and Canada. It primarily explores for cobalt and silver deposits. The company's flagship project is the Iron Creek cobalt-copper project located in Lemhi County, Idaho. It also operates a cobalt refinery for producing battery materials for the electric vehicle supply chain. The company was formerly known as First Cobalt Corp. and changed its name to Electra Battery Materials Corporation in December 2021. Electra Battery Materials Corporation was incorporated in 2011 and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.
About MP Materials
MP Materials Corp., together with its subsidiaries, produces rare earth materials. The company owns and operates the Mountain Pass Rare Earth mine and processing facility in North America. It holds the mineral rights to the Mountain Pass mine and surrounding areas, as well as intellectual property rights related to the processing and development of rare earth minerals. The company was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Receive News & Ratings for Electra Battery Materials Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Electra Battery Materials and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
