Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR – Get Free Report) and 5E Advanced Materials (NASDAQ:FEAM – Get Free Report) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.
Earnings and Valuation
This table compares Quaker Houghton and 5E Advanced Materials”s revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
| Quaker Houghton | $1.89 billion | 1.09 | -$2.49 million | ($0.12) | -988.03 |
| 5E Advanced Materials | N/A | N/A | -$31.56 million | ($2.67) | -0.67 |
Insider and Institutional Ownership
77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of 5E Advanced Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Analyst Ratings
This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Quaker Houghton and 5E Advanced Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
| Quaker Houghton | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2.33 |
| 5E Advanced Materials | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2.25 |
Quaker Houghton currently has a consensus target price of $175.67, suggesting a potential upside of 48.16%. 5E Advanced Materials has a consensus target price of $6.38, suggesting a potential upside of 254.17%. Given 5E Advanced Materials’ higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe 5E Advanced Materials is more favorable than Quaker Houghton.
Volatility and Risk
Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, 5E Advanced Materials has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its share price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Profitability
This table compares Quaker Houghton and 5E Advanced Materials’ net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
| Quaker Houghton | -0.13% | 8.99% | 4.42% |
| 5E Advanced Materials | N/A | -71.87% | -63.88% |
Summary
Quaker Houghton beats 5E Advanced Materials on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.
About Quaker Houghton
Quaker Chemical Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, develops, produces, and markets various formulated specialty chemical products for a range of heavy industrial and manufacturing applications in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. It offers metal removal fluids, cleaning fluids, corrosion inhibitors, metal drawing and forming fluids, die-cast mold releases, heat treatment and quenchants, metal forging fluids, hydraulic fluids, specialty greases, offshore sub-sea energy control fluids, rolling lubricants, rod and wire drawing fluids, and surface treatment chemicals. The company also provides chemical management services. It serves steel, aluminum, automotive, aerospace, offshore, container, mining, and metalworking companies. The company was founded in 1918 and is headquartered in Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.
About 5E Advanced Materials
5E Advanced Materials, Inc. engages in the exploration and development of mineral properties in Australia and the United States. The company primarily explores for borates and lithium deposits. It holds 100% interest in the Fort Cady project located in the Mojave Desert region in eastern San Bernardino County, California. The company was formerly known as American Pacific Borates Limited. The company was incorporated in 2016 and is based in Hesperia, California.
Receive News & Ratings for Quaker Houghton Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Quaker Houghton and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
