Financial Contrast: CIMG (NASDAQ:IMG) and Darling Ingredients (NYSE:DAR)

CIMG (NASDAQ:IMG) and Darling Ingredients (NYSE:DAR) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

23.4% of CIMG shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.4% of Darling Ingredients shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of CIMG shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Darling Ingredients shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

CIMG has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darling Ingredients has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares CIMG and Darling Ingredients’ net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CIMG	N/A	-23.59%	-15.90%
Darling Ingredients	3.54%	5.65%	2.61%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for CIMG and Darling Ingredients, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CIMG	1	0	0	0	1.00
Darling Ingredients	0	3	10	0	2.77

Darling Ingredients has a consensus target price of $67.82, indicating a potential upside of 6.95%. Given Darling Ingredients’ stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Darling Ingredients is more favorable than CIMG.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares CIMG and Darling Ingredients”s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CIMG	$10.30 million	0.21	-$4.88 million	($4.00)	-0.06
Darling Ingredients	$6.14 billion	1.64	$62.80 million	$1.38	45.95

Darling Ingredients has higher revenue and earnings than CIMG. CIMG is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darling Ingredients, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Darling Ingredients beats CIMG on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

About CIMG

CIMG Inc. is a digital marketing, sales and distribution company for various consumer products with focuses on food and beverages. CIMG Inc., formerly known as NUZEE INC., is based in BEIJING.

About Darling Ingredients

Darling Ingredients Inc. develops, produces, and sells natural ingredients from edible and inedible bio-nutrients in North America, Europe, China, South America, and internationally. The company operates through three segments: Feed Ingredients, Food Ingredients, and Fuel Ingredients. It offers ingredients and customized specialty solutions for customers in the pharmaceutical, food, pet food, feed, industrial, fuel, bioenergy, and fertilizer industries. The company also collects and transforms various animal by-product streams into useable and specialty ingredients, such as collagen, edible fats, feed-grade fats, animal proteins and meals, plasma, pet food ingredients, organic fertilizers, yellow grease, fuel feedstock, green energy, natural casings, and hides. In addition, it recovers and converts used cooking oil and animal fats, and residual bakery products into valuable feed and fuel ingredients. Further, the company provides environmental services, including grease trap collection and disposal services to food service establishments. It primarily operates under the Rendac, Sonac, FASA, Ecoson, Rousselot, Gelnex, and CTH brand names. The company was formerly known as Darling International Inc. and changed its name to Darling Ingredients Inc. in May 2014. Darling Ingredients Inc. was founded in 1882 and is headquartered in Irving, Texas.